Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 15, 2012PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.

In February, 2006, a jury convicted Ryan Marshall (defendant) of being an accessory before the fact to murder, G. L. c. 274, § 2 (§ 2),1 on an indictment alleging that he, “before the said felony was committed, did incite, procure, aid, counsel, hire or command that” four named men murder George R. Carpenter. Although the evidence at trial was sufficient to establish that the defendant had participated in the murderous assault, we reversed his conviction in Commonwealth v. Rod*530riguez, 457 Mass. 461, 482-488 (2010) (Rodriguez), because the evidence did not establish that he had done any act…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  2. Robinson v. CookCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. DurandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  4. Commonwealth v. SelavkaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  5. Marshall v. Bristol Superior CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API