Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cassidy

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 16, 1991PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

The defendant in this case, Stephen P. Cassidy, was indicted for rape. He was first tried in October of 1989. After four days of testimony and approximately one full day of deliberations, the judge declared a mistrial, thus ending the first proceeding. Cassidy thereafter filed a motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that further proceedings would violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The motion judge reported the matter to the Appeals Court, 1 which held that a second trial would not violate the Constitution because the judge at…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  4. Gori v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Luk v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. RabbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. EllisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. LopesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. BeauchampMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API