Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Johnson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 5, 1998PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFried, J.

The defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree by reason of deliberate premeditation and extreme atrocity or cruelty.1 He sought to persuade the jury that he acted either in self-defense or at least out of fear of the victim, and he complains that, among other errors at trial, errors in the trial judge’s charge prevented the jury from properly considering those claims. We affirm the conviction and decline to exercise our authority under G. L. c. 278, § 33E, to order a new trial or reduce the degree of guilt.

I

The defendant, Johnson, and the victim, Charles Malone, had been friends…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. MelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RandolphMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. SimpsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. SouzaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. HamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API