Legal Opinion

Maretz-Franford, Inc. v. Kramer

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 22, 1986No. 3674PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendants, Arnold Kramer and Cheryl Kramer, seeking to recover a broker’s commission for the sale of the defendants’ commercial real estate under an exclusive listing agreement. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff in the *122amount of $50,000. The defendants have appealed from that judgment claiming that the court erred: (1) in holding that the real estate listing agreement sued upon by the plaintiff complied with General Statutes § 20-325a (b); (2) in holding that the real estate listing agreement was severable, and as severable, complied with § 20-325a (b); (3) in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lach v. CahillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. John F. Epina Realty, Inc. v. Space Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Cone v. PedersenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  4. Fullerton v. McGowanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ditchkus Real Estate Co. v. StormConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  2. Levy, Miller, Maretz, LLC v. VuosoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  3. Ditchkus Real Estate Co. v. Storm, No. Cv89 02 99 84s (Sep. 12, 1990)Connecticut Superior Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API