Maretz-Franford, Inc. v. Kramer
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.
The plaintiff sued the defendants, Arnold Kramer and Cheryl Kramer, seeking to recover a broker’s commission for the sale of the defendants’ commercial real estate under an exclusive listing agreement. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff in the *122amount of $50,000. The defendants have appealed from that judgment claiming that the court erred: (1) in holding that the real estate listing agreement sued upon by the plaintiff complied with General Statutes § 20-325a (b); (2) in holding that the real estate listing agreement was severable, and as severable, complied with § 20-325a (b); (3) in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lach v. CahillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- John F. Epina Realty, Inc. v. Space Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Cone v. PedersenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Fullerton v. McGowanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ditchkus Real Estate Co. v. StormConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Levy, Miller, Maretz, LLC v. VuosoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Ditchkus Real Estate Co. v. Storm, No. Cv89 02 99 84s (Sep. 12, 1990)Connecticut Superior Court · 1990