Legal Opinion
Cone v. Pedersen
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 30, 1944PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
This is an action by the plaintiff to recover of the defendant a commission as agreed for the sale of farm property of the defendant in Middletown. The trial court rendered judgment for the defendant and the plaintiff has appealed. The finding as corrected contains these material facts: The plaintiff is a real estate broker. The defendant is the owner of a farm in Middletown. On April 7, 1943, the parties, after verbal agreement, entered into a written memorandum which is exhibit A and reads as follows:
“April 7, 1943
“To Aage Cone
“In consideration of your listing for sale and undertaking to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Valente v. WeinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- Bentley v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Godburn v. MeserveSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Rathbun v. McLaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
- Asbestos Products Corporation v. MatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brazo v. Real Estate CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- O'Keefe v. BassettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Sessa v. GigliottiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- William Pitt, Inc. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Stagg v. LawtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.