Legal Opinion
Al Odah v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 20, 2004No. CIV.A. 02-828(CKK)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Petitioners’ challenge to the United States Government’s procedures regulating access of attorneys to individuals detained at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base. This Memorandum Opinion and Order addresses the procedures as they apply to Mohammed Ahmed al Kandari, Fawzi Khalid Abdullah Fahad al Odah, and Khalid Abdullah Mishal al Mutairi. 1 Petitioners are three Kuwaiti nationals who have been detained since shortly after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, and counsel working on their behalf have filed what are,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Lonegan v. HastyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Al-Joudi v. BushDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Tarkel v. at & T Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
- In Re GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE CONTINUED ACCESS TO COUNSELDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.