Legal Opinion
Al-Joudi v. Bush
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 26, 2005No. Civ.A. 05-301(GK), Civ.A. 04-2035(GK), Civ.A. 05-280(GK), Civ.A. 05-1601(GK)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KESSLER, District Judge.
Petitioners originally filed a joint Emergency Motion to Compel Access to Counsel and Information Related to Petitioners’ Medical Treatment (“Motion”) in the above-captioned cases. The Court set an expedited briefing schedule and ordered the parties to re-file their briefs with relevant legal authority. Petitioners then refiled their Motion as a Preliminary Injunction. A hearing was held on October 14, 2005. Upon consideration of the revised Motion, Opposition, Reply, supplemental materials, and arguments made at the Motion Hearing, Petitioners’…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Harris v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rasul v. BushSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Serono Labs Inc v. Ferring Pharm. Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Husayn v. GatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- In Re GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE CONTINUED ACCESS TO COUNSELDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Tumani v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Omar v. HarveyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Hatim v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.