Legal Opinion

In Re Cummings

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 1983No. 83-605PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter comes before the court for consideration of a petition filed by the Board on Professional Responsibility for the temporary suspension of respondent from the practice of law, and of the pleadings and oral argument in support of and in opposition to the petition.

We grant the petition for temporary suspension. The Board has established, by unrebutted affidavits, that respondent used escrow funds to pay a former employee; that escrow accounts have been overdrawn, and that checks drawn on escrow accounts have been returned for insufficient funds; and that there have been unexplained…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burleigh v. State Bar of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Laughlin v. WheatCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  3. In Re MalvinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. VaralloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. In Re BalsamoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. In re CummingsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. In re CummingsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API