Legal Opinion
In Re Balsamo
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 30, 2001No. 99-BG-1568PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent Richard W. Balsamo, a member of the Bar of the District of Columbia, was suspended from practice for thirty days by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Our Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) recommends the reciprocal discipline of respondent under D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11. Respondent argues against the imposition of reciprocal discipline, contending that: (1) he was denied due process, both before the D.C. Circuit and before the Board; and (2) the misconduct, assuming it was established, warrants discipline substantially different from…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- United States v. Nicholas J. Mangieri, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Matter of ShorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re SlatteryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Melvin FinkSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- In Re EdelsteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In re Barry J. NaceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- In re Dobbie & In re TaylorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023