Legal Opinion

Lapare v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 10, 1987No. 1 CA-IC 3454PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROOKS, Presiding Judge.

In this special action review of an industrial commission award, we must determine whether the administrative law judge abused his discretion by denying compensation for a mental breakdown. We conclude that the award is reasonably supported by the evidence and therefore affirm.

The facts are relatively undisputed. Petitioner (claimant) was employed as a bus driver for the defendant employer, Trailways, and had been so employed for over 20 years. He was working under a union contract, which was not due to expire until May 1985.

In June or July of 1984, Trailways’…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Eastin v. BroomfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Ford v. Revlon, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. School District No. 1 v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Sloss v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Grammatico v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. Murphy v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Barnes v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  4. Lou Grubb Chevrolet v. INDUS. COM'NCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  5. Special Fund Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API