Lambeth v. Fowler
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
The first issue upon appeal is whether plaintiff was required by the will to make an election.
An election is required only if the will discloses that it was the testator’s manifest purpose to put the beneficiary to an election. Bank v. Barbee, 260 N.C. 106, 131 S.E. 2d 666 (1963). “The doctrine of equitable election is in derogation of the property right of the true owner. Hence, the intention to put the beneficiary to án election must appear plainly from the terms of the will (citations omitted).” Burch v. Sutton, 266 N.C. 333, 335, 145 S.E. 2d 849, 851 (1966). The doctrine does…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Honeycutt v. Citizens National Bank in GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Olive v. BiggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Entwistle v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- North Carolina National Bank v. BarbeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Jernigan v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estate of Williamson v. WilliamsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Hooks v. MayoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Hooks v. MayoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989