Legal Opinion

North Carolina National Bank v. Barbee

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 19, 1963No. 462PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

In the vast majority of jurisdictions the rule is that merely qualifying as executor or administrator c.t.a. is not sufficient standing alone, to constitute an election to take under the will but is a factor tending to establish such an election which must be considered in conjunction with all the other circumstances. 57 Am. Jur., Wills, §1539; Anno. — Wills — Election by Beneficiary, 166 A.L.R. 316, 320.

The early cases in North Carolina held that if a wife qualified as executrix rar 'administratrix, c.t.a. of her husband’s will, the iact of qualifying and undertaking upon oath to carry out…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Honeycutt v. Citizens National Bank in GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Lovett v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Elmore v. . ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. Allen v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mansour v. RabilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Burch v. SuttonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Crowell Constructors, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. CobeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Ashburn v. WickerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. North Carolina National Bank v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API