Hooks v. Mayo
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Dissent
*662Judge LEWIS
dissenting.
I dissent. The court’s construction of the language of a will must be guided by the intent of the testator. White v. Alexander, 290 N.C. 75, 224 S.E. 2d 617 (1976). The testator’s intent is to be gathered from the four corners of the will. Vick v. Vick, 297 N.C. 280, 254 S.E. 2d 576 (1979). The construction of particular words is to be guided by an examination of the instrument in its entirety. Lambeth v. Fowler, 33 N.C. App. 596, 235 S.E. 2d 914 (1977). In its entirety, the will states:
I give to my wife, Sophia Jarman Mayo, all my Personal Property, Real Estate, Money,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chas. W. Priddy & Co. v. SanderfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Wilson v. FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, REIDSVILLE, NCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Schaeffer v. . HaseltineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- White v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Palmer v. KetnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.