Legal Opinion

United States v. Flores-Villar

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 6, 2008No. 07-50445PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYMER, Circuit Judge:

Ruben Flores-Villar raises a challenge under the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment’s due process clause on the basis of age and gender to two former sections of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1401(a)(7) and 1409 (1974), which impose a five-year residence requirement, after the age of fourteen, on United States citizen fathers — but not on United States citizen mothers— before they may transmit citizenship to a child born out of wedlock abroad to a non-citizen. This precise question has not been addressed before, but the answer follows…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Sessions v. Morales-SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  2. Anderson v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. Jesus Valdez-NovoaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Ursack, Inc. v. Sierra Interagency Black Bear GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. Marguet-PilladoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API