United States v. Flores-Villar
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RYMER, Circuit Judge:
Ruben Flores-Villar raises a challenge under the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment’s due process clause on the basis of age and gender to two former sections of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1401(a)(7) and 1409 (1974), which impose a five-year residence requirement, after the age of fourteen, on United States citizen fathers — but not on United States citizen mothers— before they may transmit citizenship to a child born out of wedlock abroad to a non-citizen. This precise question has not been addressed before, but the answer follows…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Sessions v. Morales-SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Anderson v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Jesus Valdez-NovoaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Ursack, Inc. v. Sierra Interagency Black Bear GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Marguet-PilladoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.