Legal Opinion
Ursack, Inc. v. Sierra Interagency Black Bear Group
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 9, 2011No. 09-17152PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ADELMAN, District Judge:
The National Park Service and the United States Forest Service require backpackers who visit certain areas in the Sierras to store food in portable bear-resistant containers. Between 2001 and 2007, both the Park Service and the Forest Service required visitors to Yosemite National Park, Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (“SEKI”), and the Inyo National Forest to use containers that had been tested and approved by the agencies. An informal body known as the Sierra Inter-agency Black Bear Group (“SIBBG”) tested privately manufactured bear-resistant containers…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Earth Island Institute v. CarltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Native Ecosystems Council v. U.S. Forest Service, an agency of U.S. Dept. of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- New York Pathological and X-Ray Laboratories, Inc. v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- New York v. U.S. Dep't of CommerceDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- ASSE International, Inc. v. KerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Agua Caliente Tribe of Cupeno v. Tara Katuk Mac Lean SweeneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Nazareth Hospital v. Secretary United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Pedro Perez Perez v. Chad WolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.