Legal Opinion

Howard Pore, Inc. v. State Commissioner of Revenue

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1948No. Calendar No. 44,067PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

The general sales tax law of the State, Act No. 167, Pub. Acts 1933, as amended, * imposes, subject to specified exceptions and deductions, an annual privilege tax on all persons engaged in the business of making sales of tangible personal property at retail. The amount of such tax is determined on the basis of 3 per cent, of the gross proceeds of such sales. Section 1 of the statute as originally enacted defined the term “gross proceeds” as follows:

“(c) The term ‘gross proceeds’ means the amount received in money, credits, property or other money’s worth in consideration of sales at retail…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. City of Grand Rapids v. CrockerMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Boyer-Campbell Co. v. FryMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. C. F. Smith Co. v. FitzgeraldMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Leininger v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Smith v. City CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Rovas v. SBC MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re Complaint of Rovas Against SbcMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. General Motors Corp. v. ErvesMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Kinder Morgan Michigan, LLC v. City of JacksonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Fusco-Amatruda Co. v. Tax CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API