Legal Opinion

Boyer-Campbell Co. v. Fry

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1935No. Docket No. 128, Calendar No. 38,201PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjshnell, J.

This appeal is with respect to the meaning of that portion of Act No. 167, Pub. Acts 1933, approved June 28th, and known as the “general sales tax act,” which reads:

“The term ‘sale at retail’ means any transaction by which is transferred for consideration the ownership of tangible personal property, when such transfer is made in the ordinary course of the transferor’s business and is made to the transferee for consumption or use or for any other purpose than for resale in the form of tangible personal property.” Section 1 (b. 1).
“The term ‘sale at retail’ includes sales of electricity for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fawcus MacHine Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. A. Magnano Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Fox v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Reif v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1933

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. Rovas v. SBC MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re Complaint of Rovas Against SbcMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Magreta v. Ambassador Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Franks v. White Pine Copper DivisionMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State Ex Rel. Barker v. ManchinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API