Legal Opinion

Herigstad v. Hardrock Oil Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1935No. 7,447PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

The defendant, Hardrock Oil Company, a Montana corporation, has appealed from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, O. B. Herigstad, on the pleadings setting up and admitting the following facts:

In 1921, one Guy Craig secured from the federal government a permit to prospect a quarter-section of land for oil and gas, and, on May 24, 1926, entered into an “operating agreement” with one William D. Campbell, trustee. By the terms and conditions of this agreement Craig granted to Campbell the sole and exclusive right of possession of the north half of the quarter-section for the purpose mentioned…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. National Oil & Pipe Line Co. v. TeelTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Venture Oil Co. v. FrettsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. In Re Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Marias River Syndicate v. Big West Oil Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Crawford v. RitcheyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kintner v. HarrMontana Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Roget v. Grand Pontiac, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Rock Island Oil and Refining Company v. SimmonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Aronow v. BishopMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Riis v. DayMontana Supreme Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API