Legal Opinion

Aronow v. Bishop

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1938No. 7,836PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

This is an action to quiet title to two oil and gas leases issued by the United States to plaintiff. On appropriate pleadings, the sufficiency of which is not questioned, the case was tried to the court without a jury. The court found that on December 15, 1921, the Secretary of the Interior issued and delivered to Gordon Campbell an oil and gas prospecting permit covering certain described lands in Toole county; that oil in commercial quantities was discovered in October, 1924, on parts of this land, * during the time the permit was in full force and effect, and sufficient in quantity to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. National Oil & Pipe Line Co. v. TeelTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Venture Oil Co. v. FrettsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Dougherty v. California Kettleman Oil Royalties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Bellport v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. In Re Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Oldland v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  2. Torgeson v. ConnellyWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Kutz Canon Oil & Gas Co. v. HarrNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Rock Island Oil and Refining Company v. SimmonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Ross v. First Trust & Savings BankMontana Supreme Court · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API