Roget v. Grand Pontiac, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge TAUBMAN.
In this action arising from an auto lease dispute, defendant, Grand Pontiac, Inc., appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict against it and in favor of plaintiffs, Mark D. and Lori L. Roget. Plaintiffs challenge on cross-appeal the trial court's determinations regarding attorney fees and costs. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further findings.
In January 1990, the Rogets entered into an auto lease with Grand Pontiac. Shortly thereafter, Grand Pontiac assigned the lease to General Electric Capital Auto Lease (GE-CAL). In January 1991, GECAL…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Case v. Unified School District No. 233Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Palmer v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Rugg v. McCartySupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Haroco, Incorporated, Roman Ceramics, Incorporated, California Originals, Incorporated v. American National Bank and Trust Company of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- American Water Development, Inc. v. City of AlamosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Valentine v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- Qwest Services Corp. v. BloodSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Brody v. HellmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Reigel v. SavaSeniorCare L.L.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- Kennedy v. King Soopers Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.