Legal Opinion
Amoco Oil Co. v. Village of Schaumburg
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided December 29, 1995No. 1-94-3648PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice T. O’Brien
Plaintiff, Amoco Oil Company (Amoco), filed a two-count complaint against defendant, Village of Schaumburg (Schaumburg), in connection with the conditional granting and subsequent revocation of a special use permit. The gravamen of the complaint centered upon Schaumburg’s requirement that Amoco dedicate approximately 20% of its property as a means of securing approval of a zoning application. After Amoco filed suit in the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Schaumburg revoked the ordinance in an apparent effort to divest the Federal court of jurisdiction. (Amoco Oil…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hanna v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Rogers MacHinery, Inc. v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- B.A.M. Development, L.L.C. v. Salt Lake CountyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004
- B.A.M. Development, L.L.C. v. Salt Lake CountyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004
- Hanna v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008