State v. Curley
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Brailsford, Justice.
During the night of October 18, 1967, a place of business in Mullins, South Carolina, was entered by force. The company safe was opened with tools and looted. Vance A. Curley, James Pearson and Ulysses Rattley were charged with the the offense, put to their trial, and the two first named were convicted of safecracking. Rattley was accpritted. On this appeal by Curley and Pearson the point most urgently presented is the claim that the evidence against them was the product of a constitutionally inhibited search and seizure and should have been excluded under the rule…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- State v. IsaacsOhio Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. BrockmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- State v. EasterlingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.