State v. Easterling
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Littlejohn, Justice.
All of the eight defendants were charged with possession of marihuana in violation of Section 32-1492.1 of the code, and with conspiracy to possess and use marihuana in violation of Section 16-550 of the code. All were convicted of the possession of marihuana. Defendants Clarence T. Easter-ling, Jr., and Richard D. Eddings were found guilty in addition of the conspiracy charge. All defendants have appealed the convictions.
Before trial, defendants served a motion for suppression as evidence the marihuana seized by the officers, on the ground that the search and seizure…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. CannonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- State v. BrockmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- In re BazenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- State v. JihadCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- State v. JihadCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000