Legal Opinion

State v. Easterling

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 1, 1971No. 19328PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Justice.

All of the eight defendants were charged with possession of marihuana in violation of Section 32-1492.1 of the code, and with conspiracy to possess and use marihuana in violation of Section 16-550 of the code. All were convicted of the possession of marihuana. Defendants Clarence T. Easter-ling, Jr., and Richard D. Eddings were found guilty in addition of the conspiracy charge. All defendants have appealed the convictions.

Before trial, defendants served a motion for suppression as evidence the marihuana seized by the officers, on the ground that the search and seizure…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. State v. CannonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. DanielsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  2. State v. BrockmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  3. In re BazenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. JihadCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. JihadCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API