Legal Opinion

State v. Brockman

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 17, 1997No. 2752PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURETON, Judge:

William T. Brockman (Brockman) appeals from his convictions for a number of drug offenses. 1 At trial, the state introduced into evidence crack and powder cocaine which Brockman’s mother and sister found when, they pried open the compartment of Brockman’s moped in the presence of Green-ville County Sheriffs Deputies. Brockman contends his mother did not have authority to consent to a search of the moped’s compartments, and argues the discovery of the drugs cannot be justified as the result of a purely private search. We hold the evidence was improperly admitted.

I. FACTS

Before…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BrockmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. BlassingameCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. LauxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API