State v. Brockman
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CURETON, Judge:
William T. Brockman (Brockman) appeals from his convictions for a number of drug offenses. 1 At trial, the state introduced into evidence crack and powder cocaine which Brockman’s mother and sister found when, they pried open the compartment of Brockman’s moped in the presence of Green-ville County Sheriffs Deputies. Brockman contends his mother did not have authority to consent to a search of the moped’s compartments, and argues the discovery of the drugs cannot be justified as the result of a purely private search. We hold the evidence was improperly admitted.
I. FACTS
Before…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BrockmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- State v. BlassingameCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- State v. LauxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.