Legal Opinion
Gripe v. Hatmaker
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 16, 1941No. 29461PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, J'.
This is an action for damage to crops and to land allegedly caused by a landowner in diverting surface waters from their natural drainage location on his land onto the land of the adjoining owner. This trial resulted in a verdict in favor of F. W. Hatmaker, plaintiff, in the amount of $500, from which judgment Charles A. Gripe and Mary Gripe Bohn, defendants, appeal. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
The defendants’ sole contention is that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the verdict, whether it be for crop damage or permanent damage to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Garrett v. HaworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Bowles v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Greis v. HarjoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
3Cited by8 opinions
- Clayton Peterson v. Raymond Hager, D/B/A Hager's Flying ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- City of Okmulgee v. WallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Shannon v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Shell Oil Co. v. TateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Portable Drilling Corp. v. GuinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.