Legal Opinion

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Jones

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 20, 1939No. 27532PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff, S. E. Jones, against the defendants for damages caused by pollution of a stream by the discharge therein of oil and salt water from defendants’ wells. Plaintiff rented the lands traversed by the stream with knowledge of its polluted condition, and sued for damages to crops, and for expense of watering stock kept by him. The jury rendered a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $500, and defendants appeal.

I. Defendants’ first contention is that the trial court erred in giving instruction No. 10 upon the wrong theory of the measure of damages. That…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Garrett v. HaworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Local Building & Loan Ass'n v. Hudson-Houston Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Commercial Drilling Co. v. KennedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Oklahoma City v. PageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gripe v. HatmakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. Jordan v. PeekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. Anderson v. HodgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Mohawk Drilling Co. v. BiffleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Jordan v. PeekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API