Legal Opinion

Hicks v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 12, 1951No. 4664PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of incest with his daughter 14 years of age (see § 41-811, Ark. Stats.), and prosecutes this appeal. The original and supplemental motions for new trial present the matters herein discussed:

I. Sufficiency of the Evidence. The prosecuting witness testified unequivocally that the acts of intercourse had occurred at various intervals during a period of seventeen months. Her testimony made a case for the jury in view of our holding on the nest point. See Ragsdale v. State, 132 Ark. 210, 200 S. W. 802.

II. Lack of Corroboration. The testimony of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sutton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  2. Ragsdale v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Doss v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  4. Westbrooks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pueblo v. Chévere HerediaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1995
  2. Camp v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  4. Camp v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API