Legal Opinion · Dissent
Walker v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 31, 1966No. 5186PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Dissent
El. F. McFaddin, Justice,
(dissenting in part.) On October 31, 1966, this Court delivered a unanimous Opinion affirming the judgment of conviction of the Trial Court in this case. In due time a petition for rehearing was filed, which, in the alternate, prayed for permission to proceed under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1. The per curiam of this Court this day delivered denies a rehearing in the case. I agree with the Majority in denying the rehearing.
The said per curiam, however, contains this language: “Permission is granted to appellant to file a petition in the Trial Court under Criminal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- State v. MartineauSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Little v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Sutton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Clayton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- James Dean Walker v. A.L. Lockhart, Superintendent of the Arkansas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Commonwealth v. PrietoFairfax County Circuit Court · 2010
- James Dean Walker v. A.L. Lockhart, Superintendent of the Arkansas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984