Legal Opinion
Hall v. United Technologies, Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 12, 1995No. Civ. 3:93cv1948(AHN)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
NEVAS, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, thirteen former employees of the defendant, the Hamilton Standard Division of United Technologies Corp. (“United Technologies”), bring this action pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 1001-1461 (West 1985 & Supp.1994) (“ERISA”). In their Second Amended Complaint, the plaintiffs allege that United Technologies either intentionally or negligently misled them in 1991 when they agreed to voluntarily terminate their employment with the company.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Fee LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Sauer v. Xerox Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1997
- Hijeck v. United Technologies Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1998