Legal Opinion

Rystedt v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 20, 1932No. 28,831PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Certiorari to review a decision of the industrial commission awarding respondent compensation for an accidental injury.

That respondent was an employe of relator on November 24, 1930; that on said date while so employed he sustained an- accidental injury which arose out of and in the course of the employment; that relator had notice and knowledge of the accidental injury within the statutory period; that as a result of the injury respondent required medical attention and received the same from Dr. C. J. Ehrenberg; and that relator has paid compensation of $14.85 per week to respondent for six…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Behan v. John B. Honor Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  2. Hunnewell's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  3. Armour Grain Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  4. United States Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Welchlin v. Fairmont Railway MotorsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fruehauf Corp. v. PraterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  2. Hartman v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Mitchell v. White Castle Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Kruchowski v. Swift CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. McGrath v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API