Legal Opinion
Long v. Ideal Elec. & Mfg. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 13, 1926No. 16532PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
FOSTER, C.
This was an action commenced in the district court of Tulsa county by the defendant in error, Ideal Electric & Manufacturing Company, a corporation, as plaintiff, against the plaintiffs in error, R. D. Long and H. H. Bell, as defendants, to recover upon a certain promissory note for the sum of $1,334.34, dated November 26, 1923, and payable April 26, 1924. Parties will be hereinafter referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
The execution and delivery of the note was admitted by the defendants, and they defended upon the ground that the note was without…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Scott v. Vulcan Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Obenchain Boyer v. Incorporated Town of RoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Updegrove v. Gould Balance Valve Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Voris v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Voris v. GageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- International Harvester Co. v. SniderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Straight v. James Talcott, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Honnold v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Marion Machine, Foundry & Supply Co. v. Cincinnati Coffin Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1955
- Straight v. TalcottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964