Updegrove v. Gould Balance Valve Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Alfalfa County; F. M. Gustin, Judge. Action by the Gould Balance Valve Company against William B. Updegrove. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUMMONS, C.
This action was commenced by the defendant in error, hereinafter styled the “plaintiff,” against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter styled the “defendant,” to recover upon two promissory notes each for the sum of $45 and accrued interest. At the conclusion of the trial in the county court, upon appeal from a justice of the peace court, the court upon motion of the plaintiff directed the jury to return a verdict for plaintiff for the full amount claimed. To this ruling defendant excepted and filed his motion for new trial, which being overruled, he brings this proceeding…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Scott v. Vulcan Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
3Cited by7 opinions
- Security Ins. Co. of New Haven v. CameronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Riner v. Southwestern Surety Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Moline Plow Co. v. HoovenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Voris v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Long v. Ideal Elec. & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.