Voris v. Hall
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Major County; James B. Cullison, Judge!. Action by E, C. Voris against Howard Hall and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This was an action upon two promissory not^s given in payment of a thoroughbred stallion commenced by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against the defendant in error, defendants below. Hereafter, for convenience, the parties will be called “plaintiff” and “defendants,” respectively, as they appeared in the trial court.
In their answer the defendants allege a breach of warranty, in that said stallion did not get 60 per cent, of all healthy and regular breeding mares in foal, as by the contract of sale the stallion was warranted to do. The question for review arises out of the following…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Scott v. Vulcan Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Updegrove v. Gould Balance Valve Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Voris v. GageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
3Cited by7 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. PeelerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. PeelerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Moline Plow Co. v. HoovenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Long v. Ideal Elec. & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Straight v. James Talcott, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.