Legal Opinion
Borgia v. Prudential Insurance Company
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 19, 2000No. 14 E.D. Appeal Docket 1999Published
1Opinion of the Court
750 A.2d 843 (2000)
Carmen BORGIA, Appellant,
v.
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued October 19, 1999.
Decided May 19, 2000.
Michael T. van der Veen, Monroeville, Robert J. Baccari, for Carmen Borgia.
Charles W. Carven, for Prudential Insurance Co.
Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.
OPINION
SAYLOR, Justice.
This appeal requires us to examine the nature and scope of a contractual arbitration provision in a policy of automobile insurance.
On August 14, 1992, an automobile owned and operated by Appellant, Carmen Borgia,…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Eichelman v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Hall v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Flightways Corp. v. Keystone Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Runewicz v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Ambridge Borough Water Authority v. ColumbiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.