Legal Opinion

Pitt v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This was a civil action to recover damages for wrongful death. The evidence tended to show that the defendant operates a line of railroad running through the town of Elm City. The public highway crosses the tracks at grade. There are two main tracks at the crossing, the east track being the northbound, and the west track being the southbound. The evidence further disclosed that the defendant maintained a watchman at said crossing.

On or about 6 December, 1930, at about four o'clock in the afternoon, the plaintiff's intestate, riding in a buggy and driving a mule, undertook to cross the tracks.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harrison v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Coleman v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  3. Tart Ex Rel. Tart v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Ramey v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Oldham v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Cline v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  5. Cline v. Southern Ry. Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API