Legal Opinion
Vicary v. Town of Awendaw
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided December 19, 2018No. Appellate Case No. 2016-002150; Opinion No. 27855PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE HEARN :
**352The sole question before us is whether Petitioners Lynne Vicary, Kent Prause, and the South Carolina Coastal Conservation League possessed standing to contest Respondent **353Town of Awendaw's annexation of land within the Francis Marion National Forest (Ten-Foot Strip). Because the Town allegedly acted nefariously in using a decade-old letter as a petition for annexation, the circuit court found Petitioners had standing and reached the merits. The court of appeals reversed, finding Petitioners lacked standing. Vicary v. Town of Awendaw , 417 S.C. 631, 639, 790 S.E.2d 787,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Baird v. Charleston CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Ashmore v. Greater Greenville Sewer Dist.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
- Catawba Indian Tribe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- ATC South, Inc. v. Charleston CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Sea Pines Ass'n for the Protection of Wildlife, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- National Trust for Historic Preservation v. City of North CharlestonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023
- South Carolina Public Interest Foundation and John Crangle v. Alan Wilson, Attorney General for the State of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2022
- Vicary v. Town of AwendawCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019