Legal Opinion

Rochester Park, Inc. v. City of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1963PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: While section 508 ultimately might be found to be unambiguous, “ Even in the ease of an integrated written contract, the meaning of the words may depend upon various surrounding circumstances that are in dispute; the circumstances must be found as a fact before interpretation can proceed.” (3 Corbin, Contracts, § 554, p. 223.) We pass on no other questions. (Appeal from order of Monroe, Special Term, denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment and for a. declaratory judgment.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rochester Park, Inc. v. City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Eskimo Pie Corporation v. Whitelawn Dairies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  2. Frank Lowell v. Twin Disc, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1979
  4. Seaward Construction Co. v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  5. Goodstein Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API