Legal Opinion
Rochester Park, Inc. v. City of Rochester
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1963PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClarence J. Henry, J.
This is a motion on behalf of the defendant City of Rochester, under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint herein, and for a summary declaratory judgment in favor of the defendant upon a counterclaim contained in the answer.
The action was commenced on or about November 20, 1962, and is predicated upon an alleged breach, by the city, of a contract entered into between the parties on May 23, 1961, in connection with a proposed urban renewal project in the central portion of the defendant city, occasionally and informally referred to as the “…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kirke La Shelle Co. v. Paul Armstrong Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Vanadium Corp. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- M. L. Ryder Building Co. v. City of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Mansfield v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Creamer v. Metropolitan Securities Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Frank Lowell v. Twin Disc, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1979
- Seaward Construction Co. v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Goodstein Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Rochester Park, Inc. v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.