Legal Opinion
Eskimo Pie Corporation v. Whitelawn Dairies, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 16, 1968No. 64 Civ. 3702, 64 Civ. 3718PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANSFIELD, District Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 2 of the General Rules of this Court, these consolidated actions have been assigned to one judge for all purposes. A series of pretrial conferences have been held for the purpose of simplifying the issues and taking up other matters that may aid in the disposition of the actions, including the possibility of separate jury trials of certain issues pursuant to Rule 42(b), F.R.Civ.P., and the determination of evidentiary questions anticipated at such trials. This decision deals principally with the procedure to be followed by the parties in obtaining…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- William C. Atwater & Co. v. Panama RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Fogelson v. Rackfay Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Mitchill v. LathNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Seiden Associates, Inc. v. Anc Holdings, Inc., American National Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc. & Hugo Boss Usa, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Federal Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Ricardo Garza v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc., and Third-Party v. Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Walk-In Medical Centers, Inc. v. Breuer Capital Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- C.R. Anthony Co. v. Loretto Mall PartnersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.