Legal Opinion

Burke v. Zanes

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 18, 1961No. Civ. 19688PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCABE, J. pro tem. *

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered in favor of defendant Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a corporation, after its general demurrer was sustained without leave to amend.

By her second amended complaint, plaintiff seeks to recover for personal injuries sustained while on the premises owned by defendant Zanes, and alleges defendant Zanes “did rent certain portions of said premises to tenants” and plaintiff was a tenant of defendant Zanes. At or about 2 p. m. on October 28, 1959, defendant corporation undertook to set and adjust an automatic electrical…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Needham v. San Francisco & San José R.R.California Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Carlson v. LindauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Bady v. DetwilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. VIRGINIA CHANCE v. Lawry's, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Merrill v. BuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Gill v. Mission Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Dahl-Beck Electric Co. v. RoggeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API