Legal Opinion

Rodia v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 8, 1946No. Appeal, 183PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

This suit in assumpsit was brought by Carolina Rodia, plaintiff, to recover the principal sum of an accident insurance policy issued to her husband, Carmine Rodia, by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, defendant, and in which she was the named beneficiary. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff. Thereafter, the learned court below dismissed defendant’s motion for a new trial, but sustained the motion for judgment non obstante veredicto. From the judgment entered in favor of defendant, plaintiff appealed.

The policy in suit provided, inter alia, for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lucas v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. R. E. Tr. Co. of Phila. v. Met. L. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Johnson v. Kentucky Central Life & Accident InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Reserve Life Insurance Company v. WhittemoreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  2. McGarity v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Valente v. Commercial Insurance Co. of Newark, NJSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  4. Kubacki v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Frame v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API