Frame v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Horace Stern,
The question concerns the amount of proof required of plaintiff in this action on an insurance policy to recover tbe amount payable if tbe death of tbe insured resulted solely from an accident.
Tbe policy insured tbe life of David A. Erame in tbe amount of $5,000 and an additional $5,000 if bis death occurred “as a result, directly and independently of all other causes, of bodily injuries, effected solely through, external, violent and accidental means, . . . ; provided, however,. that no . Accidental Death Benefit shall be payable if such death resulted . .…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Kelly v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Arnstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Lucas v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- R. E. Tr. Co. of Phila. v. Met. L. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Beckham v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Conchita S. Lewin, of the Estate of Sidney E. Lewin, Deceased v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- McGarity v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Kubacki v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Meth v. United Benefit Life Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.