Legal Opinion

Marble Lime Co. v. Lordsburg Hotel Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1892No. 14664PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

— This is a consolidation of four actions, brought under the mechanic’s lien law, to enforce liens against a building and land owned by the Lordsburg Hotel Company, a corporation. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs, and the hotel company appeals from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.

There are elaborate briefs on file, — those of appellant covering quite a wide range of subjects. Appellant’s contention, however, is resolved into two main propositions: 1. That the findings are defective; and 2. That the chief finding of fact is not warranted by the evidence. But the real…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Willamette Steam Mills Lumbering & Manufacturing Co. v. Los Angeles College Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Kerckhoff-Cuzner Mill & Lumber Co. v. OlmsteadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bianchi v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Robison v. MitchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Nordstrom v. Corona City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Hickman v. FreiermuthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. Schindler v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API