Legal Opinion

United States v. GAF Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 12, 1978No. 77 Civ. 2984PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

OWEN, District Judge.

This is a case of first impression arising under the 1976 amendments to the Antitrust Civil Process Act. At issue is whether compulsory process, called a civil investigative demand, can be used by the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice to obtain from one party to a treble damage suit certain documents its adversary has furnished it pursuant to pretrial discovery.

In April 1973, GAF Corporation (GAF) commenced a private antitrust suit against its competitor Eastman Kodak Company (Kodak) in this court, the action being assigned to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. GAF Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Gaf Corporation, Eastman Kodak Company, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  2. H.L. Hayden Co. v. Siemens Medical Systems., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  3. United States v. Consolidated Foods Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. United States v. OshatzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  5. Tesoro Petroleum Corp. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API