Legal Opinion
United States v. Oshatz
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 22, 1988No. 87 Cr. 1000 (RWS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Michael P. Oshatz (“Oshatz”) and Leonard A. Messinger (“Messinger”) have moved pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), for an order compelling the government to provide statements and testimony the defendants believe are exculpatory. Oshatz also moves to quash government subpoenas for a transcript of a deposition he gave in McLean Financial Group v. Damaso, Civ. No. 87-1288-A (E.D.Va.). For the reasons set forth below, Oshatz’s and Messinger’s motion for an order compelling discovery is denied, and Oshatz’s…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Kevin v. Leroy and John Hitchings, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. UptonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- In Re WrightDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998