Legal Opinion
United States v. Gaf Corporation, Eastman Kodak Company, Intervenor-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 15, 1979No. 208, Docket 78-6102PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GURFEIN, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal by the United States from an order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Hon. Richard Owen) denying a petition by the United States for enforcement of a civil investigative demand (“CID”) upon GAF Corporation (“GAF”). United States v. GAF Corp., 449 F.Supp. 351 (1978). The amended Antitrust Civil Process Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1311 et seq., authorizes the Department of Justice to issue civil investigative demands to obtain from third parties documents relevant to suspected antitrust violations committed by the target of investigation.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte UppercuSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- GAF Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Hyster Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Aluminum Co. of America v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1978
- United States v. GAF Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Dr. Chester A. Wilk v. American Medical Association, the State of New York, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Martindell v. International Telephone And Telegraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Meyer Goldberg, Inc. v. Fisher Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.