H.L. Hayden Co. v. Siemens Medical Systems., Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorizes a court, upon motion by one from whom discovery is sought, to “make any [protective] order which justice requires to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense ____” Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c). Although protective orders are subject to modification, American Telephone and Telegraph Co. v. Grady, 594 F.2d 594, 596 (7th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 971, 99 S.Ct. 1533, 59 L.Ed.2d 787 (1979), there is little agreement as to the showing necessary to support…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Dr. Chester A. Wilk v. American Medical Association, the State of New York, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Iowa Beef Processors, Inc. v. Hughes A. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- In Re Beef Industry Antitrust Litigation. Neal Smith v. The National Provisioner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Martindell v. International Telephone And Telegraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago (In Re Ionosphere Clubs, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Meyer Goldberg, Inc. v. Fisher Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Bayer AG & Miles, Inc. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.