Legal Opinion
Costa v. Regents of University of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 17, 1951No. Civ. 14776PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
Respondents move to dismiss the appeal. Two separate questions are involved which for clarity of treatment must be considered separately.
The Motion op Respondents Carter and Emerson
These respondents during the course of trial made a motion for nonsuit which was granted by the court, the order granting their motion being entered in the minutes of the court on June 28, 1949, and reading so far as material here:
“Thereupon counsel for defendants . . . made a motion for a nonsuit, which said motion the court granted as to William E. Carter and Anastasia Emerson. ...”
Thereafter the trial proceeded…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Nicholson v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- McColgan v. Jones, Hubbard & Donnell, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Integral Land Corp. v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Schubert v. BatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Kimple v. ConwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hilliard v. A. H. Robins Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Costa v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Behr v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Keenan v. DeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- RITSCHEL v. City of Fountain ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.