Legal Opinion
Cobel v. Hartford Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 12, 1923No. 23,138PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The defendant Hackney, of St. Paul, Minnesota, on February 10, 1919, by a written contract sold a 3,360 acre farm in South Dakota to plaintiffs, residents of that state, who agreed to make certain payments at stated times. The contract contained these provisions affecting the present controversy:
“Insurance covering the buildings on the above described premises shall be adjusted as of the date hereof. The said party of the second part shall be entitled to assignments of the policies, upon paying to said party of the first part the unearned premiums thereon, after the date hereof.”
*235There were…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lamberton v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Vesey v. Commercial Union Assur. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
- Andrus v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Bemis v. Pacific Coast Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Wheaton v. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by4 opinions
- Yoselowitz v. Peoples Bakery, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Hare & Chase, Inc. v. National Surety Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Krug Park Amusement Co. v. New York Underwriters InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
- Rowell v. Fireman's Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927