Legal Opinion
Hare & Chase, Inc. v. National Surety Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 18, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MACK, Circuit Judge.
After the defendant moved for the appointment of an auditor in an action at law by the successor in interest of Hare & Chase, Inc., the obligee of a bond against the obligor, plaintiff’s motion for a transfer of the cause to the equity side of the court to determine several equitable issues raised by the amended answer was granted. Reformation of the bond because of alleged mutual mistake, and enjoining of the further prosecution .of the" action at law because of an alleged equitable estoppel, were thereby sought.
Plaintiff’s assignor, Hare & Chase, Inc. (hereinafter…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Phoenix Life Ins. Co. v. RaddinSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Liberty Oil Co. v. Condon National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- The Columbia Insurance Company of Alexandria, in Error v. Joseph W. Lawrence, Who Survived Thomas PoindexterSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Wallace v. World Fire & Marine Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn.District Court, S.D. California · 1947
- Hare & Chase, Inc. v. National Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Thomas v. N.A. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Resnick v. Wolf & Cohen, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.